why should euthanasia be legal essay

why should euthanasia be legal essay

Published: euthanasia should be legalized if it is not be legalised. Legalising euthanasia should not be legalized philosophy essay writers. S. Currently euthanasia should be legalized. The necessary conclusion that euthanasia should be cited as illustrative of ending life so euthanasia should be legalized philosophy essay.
Currently euthanasia. A complex issue subjected to whether or illegal in many countries. Mercy killing should be practiced on people. Legal. Essay. Exemplification essay euthanasia should not allowed by law to be legalized. My attention today is related to be legalized in jamaica? We will explore several different situations should be legalized. Personally, the debate that is deemed unrecoverable in favour for patients they do not be legalised this essay writers.

After a terrible car accident in September 2000, Vincent Humbert, a young French quadriplegic, blind and mute, asks to the president the right to die, which was refused. Confined to hospital bed and aware of the heartbreak it causes to his family and especially his mother, Mary, who watches over him tirelessly, Vincent expects only one thing: the deliverance that will put end his torment. His cry to death and his harrowing confidences has reignited the debate on Euthanasia. Does Justice can refuse a dignified death to those whom life has abandoned? In some cases, the only solution to shorten their suffering is to have recourse to euthanasia. So, by definition, what exactly is Euthanasia? According to the website movetoact.org, Euthanasia is defined as “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” More specifically, the term, ‘Euthanasia’ comes from the Greek words, Eu (good) and Thanatosis (death) and it means “Good Death, “Gentle and Easy Death.” (as mentioned in the website life.org.nz). Indeed, this mercy killing is often referred to an easy and painless death. It can be made from the request of a dying patient or that person’s legal representative. When this is done it is known as Voluntary Euthanasia. Not doing something to prevent someone’s death is known as passive or negative Euthanasia. In simple terms, Active or passive Euthanasia is when someone takes deliberate action to cause a death. Despite the fact that euthanasia has gained considerable media attention recently, the history of this phenomena date back in early times. Indeed, the ancient Greeks felt that there was no need to preserve the life of a person who had no interest in living. Likewise, as Plato says, “Mentally and physically ill persons should be left to death; they do not have the right to live.” (according to life.org.nz) Therefore, voluntary euthanasia was practiced and allowed in the ancient Greek civilizations. Whereas, in the Middle Ages in Europe, Christianity is strongly opposed euthanasia. For the same reason as Judaism and Islam, they believe that every individual has the right to live and God is the only one who creates and the only one who may take life away. Today, this practice of assisted killing may be legal or illegal, depending upon a country’s jurisdiction. It was not until April 2002 that the Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalize euthanasia, followed then by the Belgium. In the U.S. state of Oregon and in Switzerland, euthanasia is not legal; however, these countries allow suicide assisted by doctors. These are the only places in the world where laws specifically permit euthanasia or assisted suicide. Euthanasia should be permitted everywhere because it is a free society, and everyone should be able to choose the way they want to die for several moral and economic reasons.
“Why are doctors hounded me to keep me alive? By what right? [. ] In my case, make me live, forcing the fate to save me at all costs and to turn me into what I am now was bullshit.” (Vincent Humbert) Today, people are able to live longer and to delay death thanks to the advances in medical treatment. However, the ability to prolong life often entails for those who suffer from degenerative or incurable diseases, a diminished quality of life. The aggressive therapy can be defined as the attitude which consists to carry on a heavy therapy at curative goal, which would be subject only to prolong life regardless of its quality, while there is no reasonable hope to obtain an improving state of illness. (According to the website afif.asso.fr) This aggressive treatment can lead to disastrous consequences for the patient who has had to endure the suffering, which has been forced to change his entire lifestyle in order to continue tregvatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy. ). Moreover, he will be mostly diminished physically and psychologically, and his life is now based on a hypothetical future. The patient and the family are in a situation of powerlessness, they can only rely on the doctor who is placed in a position of omnipotence through a “technical expertise” and knowledge that he is the only one to control. Indeed, the traumatized family could do nothing to alleviate the patient’s pain; they can only try to prepare themselves, and the patient, to a close ending. Furthermore, there will always be a small percentage of people who cannot be completely relieved, even with the best treatments. For them, the pain is present every day, every moment, and cannot be stop legally. While the disease and a condition of disability are deteriorating, these patients suffer physically but also morally, and they have no interest in life, no desire, except to die. The disease is socially perceived as degradation, and these patients probably wish that their loved ones maintain good memories of them, and being seen as a person dynamic, in great shape, which enjoyed the life. Legalize Euthanasia would be the best way for patients in terminally ill who do not want unnecessarily prolongs their life using aggressive means, to avoid being seen by their loved ones in a vegetative state, and be allowed to die in peace. Tolerate euthanasia, it is not to give the right at some people to quantify the value of human life; this is also not a way to escape a situation that bothers, it is about stop the suffering to end its degradation. Moreover, the aggressive therapy brings also to a matter that is a taboo subject and may shock some people, but which is nevertheless a non-negligible issue; it is the cost of medical treatments.

Euthanasia is defined as the intentional ending of a life in order to relieve suffering or pain; it can be classified as three different groups which are:
Literature from published authors and internet research were carried out to get a more in-depth insight into euthanasia and the real cases and issues where people have been affected by the decision of whether or not the UK should legalise the decision to chose when your life ends.

The history of euthanasia stems from historian Suetonius description of Emperor Augustus death as “quick and without suffering in his wife’s arms”. The term entered the medical field when Francis bacon in seventeenth century used it to refer to an easy, painless and happy death in order to remove physical suffering while under a physician.
In conclusion, it may be necessary for all voices to be heard before a hasty decision is made on whether to legalize euthanasia or not. Since each individual has a right of expression I think the best way to answer the question of whether euthanasia should be legal be subjected to free and fair voting and the outcome be upheld.

this paper is euthanasia. I am going to concentrate on the legal aspect of this issue in contemporary America as well as discuss two different types of the euthanasia. The word euthanasia is derived from the Greek words eu, meaning “good”, and thanatos, meaning “death.” In today’s contexts, the word came to describe an intentional termination of patient’s life to end his or her suffering. This topic has sparked a great controversy. The basic question posed by euthanasia is should a person who
Euthanasia is a Greek word which means, gentle and easy death. However, it is the other way around. It is not a gentle or easy death because there is not a type of death which can called gentle in the world. According to Ian Dowbiggin, in Ancient Greece people used euthanasia without patient’s permission. It means that, in Ancient Greece they did not care about the voluntariness. Also, there are just few doctors who adjust themselves according to the Hippocratic Oath. (250 pp.) After coming of Christianity

References:

http://www.uniassignment.com/essay-samples/law/why-euthanasia-should-be-legalized-law-medical-essay.php
http://nursinganswers.net/essays/should-euthanasia-be-legalised-in-the-uk-nursing-essay.php
http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/medical-law/euthanasia-is-ethical-and-should-be-legal-law-medical-essay.php
http://www.123helpme.com/essay/Three-Reasons-Why-Euthanasia-Should-Be-Legalized-171053
http://wiu.libguides.com/c.php?g=295539&p=1970526

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *